[1IP-65] P2P Network: Grant Request for POC
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We are in support of this proposal because the proposed decentralized P2P network will enhance user privacy, improve the scalability for decentralized application development, and provide seamless access to 1inch APIs.
[1IP-66] - Transition to Fusion+ for the Alternative Modular Interface of 1inch
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support this proposal because it will fund the development of Fusion+, which will allow users to perform gas-free cross-chain swaps and expand the functionality of the current interface. Additionally, this transaction will improve the security of the interface through measures like phishing protection and the implementation of Permit2, which will increase user trust and platform stability.
[1RC-67] 1inch DAO Grants Working Group
Vote: Yes
Rationale: The 1inch DAO requires a methodical approach to managing its grants program, this DAO Grants Working Group takes a step in the right direction towards enforcing grant terms, and we would be glad to be part of the Grants Working Group.
[1IP-68] Deprecate v1INCH Voting Power & Standardize Unicorn Power Calculation
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support this proposal because it simplifies the current system by removing the diminishing voting power of v1INCH holders and standardizing voting weight calculations solely based on Unicorn Power (UP) generated from staked 1INCH (st1INCH). This standardization aligns with the Fusion mode resolver delegation mechanism, ensuring consistency across the platform, and fosters fairness by requiring all participants to adhere to the same staking requirements for voting.
[1IP-69] 1inch DAO Grants Working Group [Updated]
Vote: Yes
Rationale: The 1inch DAO requires a methodical approach to managing its grants program, this DAO Grants Working Group takes a step in the right direction towards enforcing grant terms, and we would be glad to be part of the Grants Working Group.
[1IP-70] Establish Legal Communications Working Group and Off-board STORM Partners
Vote: Yes
Rationale: In order to facilitate deliverables and communication with the 1inch DAOs new legal partner, we are in support of this proposal.
[1IP-71] Including the 1inch DAO updates in the official 1inch newsletter
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We are in support of improving the quality of the 1inch DAOs communication by including the 1inch DAOs updates.
[1IP-72] Engagement of New Legal Counsel for 1inch DAO
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Due to the compatibility issues with the DAOs previous legal partner, we are in support of engaging a new Legal Counsel for the 1inch DAO.
[1IP-73] Including the 1inch DAO updates in the official 1inch newsletter
Vote: Yes
Rationale: In order to facilitate deliverables and communication with the 1inch DAOs new legal partner, we are in support of this proposal.
[1IP-74] Messari Protocol Services 1inch Proposal 2025
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Besides being a valuable marketing tool for the 1inch Protocol, we believe that these research reports deliver solid insight into the 1inch Protocol for its users and the broader ecosystem audience, and investing in this kind of research is directly beneficial to the 1inch Brand.
[1IP-75] Offboard low-volume chains from 1inch
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support offboarding low-volume chains from 1inch. From my perspective, there is no value for 1inch to continue operating on these chains that offer little to no value to 1inch.
[1IP 76] Recognized Delegates Program Renewal
Vote: Yes
Rationale: As active delegates in the 1inch Delegate Program, we have played a key role in facilitating the maturity of 1inch Governance, therefore we are glad to support the renewal of this program.
[1IP-77] [Fast-Track] Authorize 1inch Foundation to Represent 1inch DAO in Hardware Wallet Dispute
Vote: Yes
Rationale: It is important for the 1inch DAO to be able to recover its funds from the hardware wallet team, therefore we are glad to support this proposal.