DAOplomats: Vision and action plan for 1inch DAO

2.2 Recognized Delegates
1

Author: jengajojo
Squad: DAOplomats

Vision of DAOplomats

DAOplomats are professional protocol politicians who aim to support the progressive decentralisation of DAOs. We onboard experts and partner with decentralised governance research groups to find the best possible solution to different problems our partner DAOs face.

This post outlines a strategy by DAOplomats to deliver the following goals in the next 180 days:

A1. Kickstart the decentralisation process for the DAO
A2. Gather feedback from the community and iteratively develop the governance process

B1. Increase community engagement throughout the collaboration
B2. Incentivise talent within the community to become stewards of the community.

C1. Propose tokenomics changes to the DAO, which brings more token holder engagement and governance participation.

How are we planning to achieve the goals?

‘’In addition to the on-chain assets currently controlled by the DAO, it also has the ability to fund the development of modules/contracts and deploy them (e.g., alternative front-ends, new network deployments, new API integrations, integrations, new smart contract deployments, etc.).’ doc.1inch.io

To achieve the goal of decentralised governance in the 1inch Network, DAOplomats are trying to build a contributor pipeline within the DAO, where the community can trustlessly join different dojos (working groups) to train their skills and propose improvements to the DAO.

For the total utilisation of the 6-month engagement, we have divided it into two 12-week intervals called ‘Inches’.

We’ll set clear goals for each ‘inch’ and offer retroactive remuneration to contributors for successfully delivering predefined goals. We will headhunt suitable coordinators to initially fill roles in the DAO, and allow leaders to emerge within the DAO as the ‘inches’ progress.

Helping the community to quality check their proposals and offer feedback and comments on proposals is also an integral part of our delegation. We extend help to individual proposal authors in 1inch DAO to develop their ideas into quality proposals. We help authors pass the snapshot proposal threshold if their proposals have completed Phase 3 in the proposal lifecycle. If you want to get feedback for a proposal in the ideation stage, ping us at hub@daoplomats.org

After building the foundation of the contributor system, we aim to strengthen social collaboration with established DAO in DeFi space.

10 Likes
2

DAOplomats.org voting Bank

[1IP-10] 1inch DAO SAFE Airdrop Claim

Voted Option: Yes
Proof of Vote

Rational

we have worked closely with @1inch and @StableNode, during the initial development of this proposal. After careful evaluation, we believe @safe DAO will achieve maximum decentralization with a diverse range of delegates with varying levels of voting power.

2 Likes
3

** [1IP-11] 1inch Staking Pods**
** Voting Option: ** Yes
We strongly support adding tokenomics changes and increasing voter participation and engagement in the DAO.

** [1IP-12] Improve Fusion Auction Resolver Competition**
Voted Option: Yes

** 1IP-13: Governance Process Improvements**
Voted Option: Yes

[1IP-14] Update 1inch DAO Voting Process to Include st1INCH(v2)
Voted Option: Yes

[1IP-15] Update 1inch DAO Voting Process to Include ‘Abstain’ option

Abstained from voting.

** [1IP-16] Community Governance Incentives**
Voted Option: Yes

** [1IP-17] 1inch DAO Donation to Humanitarian Relief Efforts in Turkiye**

Voted Yes:

@Baer.eth and @jengajojo are signers of the Multisg of BanklessDAO’s Turkey Disaster Relief Fund and are actively coordinating the efforts on behalf of bankless TurkeyDAO and BanklessDAO

** [1IP-18] 1inch Analytics Dashboard**

Voting: YES

[1IP-19] Increase the Number of Whitelisted Fusion Mode Resolver to 10

Voted: Yes, DAOplomats generally with the rationale

[1IP-20] 1INCH Fast Track Proposal

Vote: Yes, DAOplomats acknowledge that the DAO should be able to react quickly to external parties and events risks! The limited scope of the proposal should be expanded in the future to be effective!

[1IP-21] 1inch NFT Marketplace MVP

DAOplomats were involved in giving feedback and structuring the milestones of the proposal! But the proposal didn’t acknowledge the @shaitan being the core contributor of 1inch, nor did it incorporate any further feedback on choosing a different vendor.

[1IP-22 ]A Community First 1inch DAO NFT Marketplace
Voted Yes
The proposal has seemed more reasonable in terms of the development and milestones; and has a proven record, i.e in auditing ApeDAOs marketplace; we encourage both 1ip 21 and 22 to Collaborate on their strength.

[1IP-24] [Fast-Track] Deploy 1inch Network Protocols on zkSync Era.

DAOplomats voted in favour and hope to see 1inch deployed in multiple layers and chains .

[1IP-25] [Fast-Track] Deploy 1inch Fusion Mode on Multiple Networks

We failed to vote in time due to technical reasons from using a Smart-contract wallet.

[1IP-26] Remove st1INCH(v1) Voting | Modify st1INCH(v2) and v1INCH Voting Weight Calculations
Voting option - Abstain: DAOplomats acknowledge the positive steps from the 1inch team in decentralising the 1inch governance and reducing the ‘insider’ power. we choose to abstain as increasing the threshold to make proposals could produce an opposite effect than the overall intent of the proposal.

4

Upcoming proposals from DAOplomats:

  1. [RFC] Allocate 1M USDC stables in the treasury to the lending pool on AAVE
  2. [RFC] 1inchDAO Grants review council
  3. https://gov.1inch.io/discussion/9309-rfc-1inch-network-dao-operational-framework
  4. [RFC] Deploy 1 M USDC to Compound
5

[1ip 27] Allocate 1M USDC stables in the treasury to the lending pool on AAVE.
Abstained from voting on our own proposal.

6

[1IP-28] Discontinue Swap Surplus Collection

Vote: Yes (In favor of this proposal)

Sending the Swap surplus back to users will align us with the industry standards,

7

[1IP-36] Creating reviews, threads, articles, and natively working with DeFi opinion leaders

Yet to Vote

[1RDP] StableLab Delegate Pitch for the 1inch DAO

Voted in favour:
StableLabs is a reputable delegate in the DAO governance and will bring enormous experience and value to our RDP

[1RDP] DAOplomats Delegate Pitch for the 1inch DAO

Abstained from voting

[1IP 35 ]Amendment to the Recognized delegates program.

Abstained from voting on our proposal.

[1IP-34] 1inch Events Grant Proposal

Missed the voting deadline

[1IP-33] Implement Dynamic Fusion Mode Resolver Whitelist Based on Unicorn Power Threshold.

Voted in favour

[1IP- 32] StableLab <> 1INCH Grant Request

Voted in Favor

[1IP- 31] 1inch Community Builders Program

Voted in favour of launching a community Builders program from the 1inch foundation

[1IP-30] 1inch Hardware Wallet production completion

Didn’t vote on the proposal, dude to inter coordination errors

[1IP 29] Recognised delegates program

Abstained from voting on our proposal!

8

Upcoming proposals from DAOplomats:

  1. [1RC] Swap 1M USDC into OUSD to generate a stable yield
  2. [RFC] 1inchDAO Grants review council
    3. [RFC#] 1inch Network DAO operational framework
  3. [1RC] Enabling multi-chain governance 1inch DAO proposal
9

[1IP-74] Messari Protocol Services 1inch Proposal 2025.

Voted: For, Supporting this proposal guarantees consistent, transparent reporting on 1inch’s key metrics, empowering stakeholders with data-driven insights, attracting ecosystem participants, and enhancing growth through independent, high-quality research and analysis.

[1IP-73] Including the 1inch DAO updates in the official 1inch newsletter

Voted yes, with the same rationale as 1IP-72

[1IP-72] Engagement of New Legal Counsel for 1inch DAO

DAOplomats voted Yes, we believe the DAO should engage a new legal council and set up a legal entity for the DAO.

[1IP-71] Including the 1inch DAO updates in the official 1inch newsletter
Voted Yes: Boosts transparency and engagement by sharing 1inch DAO updates through established communication channels.

[1IP-70] Establish Legal Communications Working Group and Off-board STORM Partners
Sets up a Legal Communications Group to improve oversight, save funds, and ensure a smooth legal transition for the DAO.

[1IP-69] 1inch DAO Grants Working Group [Updated]
DAOplomats Abstained form our own proposal.

[1IP-68] Deprecate v1INCH Voting Power & Standardize Unicorn Power Calculation
Standardizes governance, aligns voting with protocol commitment, and removes outdated v1INCH mechanisms for streamlined participation.

[1RC-67] 1inch DAO Grants Working Group
DAOplomats Abstained form our own proposal.

[1IP-66] - Transition to Fusion+ for the Alternative Modular Interface of 1inch
This proposal boosts security, enables gasless cross-chain swaps,& improves infrastructure, enhancing usability and protection for all users

[1IP-65] P2P Network: Grant Request for POC
Voting yes supports a secure, decentralized API network, advancing d

10

[1IP-75] Offboard low-volume chains from 1inch
Voted: Yes, This proposal streamlines 1inch DAO’s operations by offboarding Fantom, Kaia, and Aurora due to low activity and high costs, ensuring more efficient resource allocation. Gnosis will be reassessed in Q4 2025.

[1IP 76] Recognized Delegates Program Renewal
Voted: Abstain

[1IP-78] Protocol Upgrades; Order Settlement in LOP; Incentives in Protocols
Voted: For, the proposal introduces essential technical upgrades that enhance security, incentivize contributors, and align with market practices

[1IP-79] Trading Terminal, Limit Orders, and Solana Integration for the Alternative Modular Interface of 1inch
Voted: No, Lacks clarity on measurable KPIs, user traction, and milestone accountability. High budget without phased funding

[1IP-80] Frontend Exploit User Reimbursement0x92b3f1f10aaacc80434c8e52651ef65f37627d173503de2664a0de73b8569df3
Voted: No, The DAO’s treasury exists to fund future growth, not to underwrite past losses. Approving this reimbursement would set an unsustainable precedent, making the DAO an insurer of last resort.

11

[1IP-81] Next Phase of the Alternative Interface: Solana, Security & P2P Updates
Voted: For, This project shows real maturity by focusing on what matters: security and resilience. Continuing work on a decentralized, community-owned interface is a vital counterbalance to centralized points of failure.

[1IP-82] Request for Grant: Cross-Chain Exchange through Secret Swaps
Voted: For, This is a smart, low-cost investment in solving one of DeFi’s most significant challenges: trustless Bitcoin interoperability. Funding this focused research phase is a prudent first step, allowing the exploration of a massive opportunity for the 1inch ecosystem without committing to a full build prematurely.

12

[1IP-83] 1inch events Grant Proposal Q3-Q4 2025
Voted: For, In a digital world, face-to-face connections are invaluable. This grant is a strategic investment in the human layer of the network, building the real-world relationships with developers, partners, and users that drive long-term, sustainable growth.

[1IP-84] Unite DeFi hackathon Grant Proposal
Voted: For, A $300k sponsorship for a single event offers a very uncertain return. The DAO’s funds would be more impactful and accountable if used to directly support a few dedicated teams through milestone-based grants.

[1IP-84] 1inch DAO Forum Migration Proposal: Commonwealth to Discourse
Voted: For, The DAO’s forum is its digital town square, and it needs to be a dependable and accessible space for conversation. This move to a more mature, professional-grade platform is a sensible investment in the long-term health of community discussion and governance.

13

[1IP-84] Unite DeFi hackathon Grant Proposal
Voted: For, A $300k sponsorship for a single event offers a very uncertain return. The DAO’s funds would be more impactful and accountable if used to directly support a few dedicated teams through milestone-based grants.

[1IP-85]Enhancing 1inch Risk Management in Regulatory Engagement and Contribution
Voted: For, It’s far better to help write the rules than to be forced to react to them later. This modest grant is a smart, proactive investment in ensuring 1inch has a constructive voice in shaping a sensible future for DeFi regulation.

[1IP-86] Treasury Funding for 2025 Security Audits of New & Upgraded Protocols
Voted: For, Security is the most fundamental investment a protocol can make. This dedicated, annual audit budget is a proactive and necessary measure to protect user funds and the protocol’s integrity as its attack surface expands with new features.

[1IP-87] Snapshot Pro Subscription
Voted: For, Paying for this service is a far more practical and less disruptive solution than attempting a complex and risky migration to a new system and its a small cost to maintain the core functionality of the DAO’s governance.

[1IP-88] Transfer Of Control Of The 1inch dApp To 1inch/ Degensoft Group; Domain Separation And Brand Alignment
Voted: For, This is a sensible and mature restructuring that allows each part of the ecosystem to play to its strengths. It lets the DAO focus on its core mission of protocol governance, while placing the demanding, 24/7 operation of the dApp with a dedicated and accountable team.

[1IP-89] Update to Resolver Access Requirements for Fusion Order Flow
Voted: For, It opens the door for more resolvers to compete based on merit, not just wealth, which creates a more efficient and competitive market for all users while maintaining security through a robust verification process.

[1IP-90][Fast Track] Eliminate PriorityFee Restrictions in Fusion Settlement Extension
Voted: For, Removing outdated gas limits enables resolvers to compete fairly for block space. This upgrade aligns the protocol with current market realities, ensuring faster execution for users without risking wasteful bidding wars.