[1IP-16] Community Governance Incentives

Author: @Bobbay_StableLab

References
Governance process
Hop example
Idle Finance example
MakerDAO
1inch on layer 3

Introduction

To boost governance activity on 1inch, we would like to incentivize community members to present proposals and receive rewards.

Motivation

An active governance culture is an essential aspect of every DAO’s operations. Active governance means that the community is dedicated to improving the protocol’s operations, which builds a culture of iteration around the protocol. However, governance work is continuously under or unpaid, making it an unattractive role.

By incentivizing an active governance culture at 1inch, we can attract participants to become more involved in 1inch DAO, thus enabling more opportunities for 1INCH to decentralize. 1INCH DAO tried a similar program last year using Layer 3, which was successful in attracting participants.

Specification

Contents

  1. Aims
  2. Allocation
  3. Eligibility
  4. Eligible Proposals
  5. Ineligible Proposals
  6. Eligible Recipients
  7. Distribution
  8. Administration
  9. Accountability
  10. Reflection

Aims

1INCH governance is still somewhat inactive, and in these current market conditions, it is even harder to attract governance participation. We hope some form of incentive will attract users to engage with the 1inch DAO.

We would like to present this program for 6 months at a total cost of 6,000 USDC.

Allocation

This proposal would allocate 6,000 USDC to a newly-made community multi-sig. Each successful proposal would receive 500 USDC. At the end of each month, the community multi-sig will distribute rewards to the eligible authors. This is to reduce the unnecessary cost to the DAO.

This would incentivize a total of 12 proposals across 6 months.

Since 1INCH earns protocol revenue in USDC, it is easier to distribute governance rewards in USDC. If all USDC is distributed, this would cost the DAO 6,000 USDC for 6 months.

Eligibility

Eligible Proposals

All proposals that follow the outlined governance workflow within 1inch DAO and successfully pass Phase 4.

Ineligible Proposals

  1. Proposals requesting budgets or grants are excluded.
  2. Grants are directed to the current 1inch grant program.
  3. Proposals making minimal amendments to previous proposals (e.g. fixing only typos) are excluded from this program.
  4. Proposals that have no direct, actionable outcome (e.g. establishing a mission statement) are excluded from this program.

Eligible Recipients

The original authors of a proposal are considered the eligible recipients of the reward. Those who initiate the Snapshot vote will not be eligible for a reward. If there are multiple authors of a proposal, it will be assumed that the reward will be evenly split unless explicitly stated otherwise to the community multi-sig disbursers.

Distribution

@RoundElephant , StableLab and @DAOplomats.eth can form the newly made community multi-sig for these community incentives with a ⅔ signature.
Distribution will occur at the beginning of the following month.

Authors of a proposal should communicate with community multi-sig signers to provide the correct wallet information for distribution. Wallet information can be communicated in private, but all transactions are public since they are on the blockchain.

StableLab, 1INCH Core Contributors and DAOplaomats will be exempt from this program and will not be eligible to receive any rewards.

Administration

  1. StableLab provides a monthly update of eligible proposals at the end of each month.
  2. Community multi-sig distributes funds in the first week of the following month.
  3. Any unspent funds at the end of 6 months will be sent back to the 1inch DAO treasury.

Accountability

StableNode will document a record of all successful proposals providing the following information:

  1. Link to Proposal
  2. Summary of Proposal
  3. Authors
  4. Transaction Payments

This will help us review this proposal and consider whether 1INCH DAO should continue to provide governance incentives or pause the program.

Reflection

The community can review these governance incentives after 6 months to evaluate their success and whether to let it continue or pause the program.

Next Steps

  1. Temperature check with a poll on the forum
  2. Move to a SnapShot poll
  3. [Yes]: Move forward with this program
  4. [No]: Do not implement this program
  5. [Abstain]
3 Likes

This is to be implemented over the “Thank 1INCH” https://gov.1inch.io/discussion/9765-1ip14-thank-1inch-automated-rewards-for-valuable-1inch-contributions in a more minimal and specified format.

This program already showed success with 1inch previous use of layer 3 xyz and extends on that.

https://gov.1inch.io/discussion/9303-rfc-governance-community-participation-incentives
reposting the previous proposal from @Bobby_StableLab, which got lost in the forum migration.

Support this proposal as it would potentially increase the number of submissions made in the DAO by independent contributors.

It will be great to have clarity on the multisig holding the funds; this proposal in the prev stage had @DAOplomats.eth as one of the Signers; since we have been removed; who will be that third person on it?

Some points to consider in the next iteration if the program is successful.

  1. Using 1INCH as the reward token instead of USDC, there is currently only 83,421 wallet which holds at least one 1INCH.
1 Like

I support this proposal.

One thing I want to verify: Is this multi-sig to be formed prior to this proposal going to Snapshot? If so, we should ensure that it is created, and the signers verify they have control, prior to this proposal going live. We’ll want to include that address in the Safesnap payload so that the $6k will be sent from the 1inch DAO Treasury upon the successful completion of the vote.

i totally support this. i voted “yes”.

Question: Will there just be 1 proposal selected each month? What if a couple of proposals submitted are eligible? How do you got about choosing which ones are rewarded?

To motivate involvement with a long term view, think rewards should be in st1INCH (for 2 years).